Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods

Columbus, NC · ~56 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods: 3.5 TCR = 93% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods safety composite

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2024

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods injury rate improved

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.5 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #80/356
  • PHOTO Allendale Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Allendale Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods averages 3.5 TCR (93% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=3 · 2020=4.8 · 2022=0 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.8

Where LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods (56 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods
LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods (56 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

LaurelHurst and LaurelWoods has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2017 5.8 1.9 3 0 0
2016 4.5 4.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 17 employers in Columbus, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Allendale Senior Living 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Downriver Estates Senior Living 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royalton WoodsA Randall Residence 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Age Senior Care of El Paso, LLC-DBA Desert Springs 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod - Tri-State 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Siler City Hatchery 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.B. Rose & Sons, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roanoke Electric Cooperative 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Luke's Hospital 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Tryon Estates 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Tryon Estates 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milliken Hatch 77 FTE
NAT-TCR Delta Pipeline Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Downriver Estates Senior Living 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston Plant 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Waterford at Mansfield 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ascot Park Senior Living 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mainstreet Village 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inverness Operations and Fleet Service 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.