Continuing care retirement communities · New Mexico

The Watermark at Cherry Hills

Albuquerque, NM · ~58 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Watermark at Cherry Hills runs at 438% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Watermark at Cherry Hills: 16.7 TCR = 438% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Watermark at Cherry Hills safety composite

The Watermark at Cherry Hills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Watermark at Cherry Hills: 0.0 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 33.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2024

The Watermark at Cherry Hills's TCR rose 7.3 from 0.0 in 2019 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 33.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Albuquerque, NM ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 438% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Windsor Manor Assist…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsor Manor Assisted Living Indianola (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

The Watermark at Cherry Hills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Watermark at Cherry Hills averages 16.7 TCR (438% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Watermark at Cherry Hills TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=33.2 · 2021=31.1 · 2022=13.8 · 2023=14.5 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Watermark at Cherry Hills falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Mexico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Continuing care retirement com employers in New Mexico.

The Watermark at Cherry Hills (58 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Watermark at Cherry Hills
The Watermark at Cherry Hills (58 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Watermark at Cherry Hills has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 4.4 5 0 0
2023 14.5 6.5 9 0 0
2022 13.8 2.0 7 0 0
2021 31.1 23.8 7 10 0
2020 33.2 30.1 4 17 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NM · Albuquerque

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsor Manor Assisted Living Indianola 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Oak Lawn Management LLC 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westminster Woods at Huntingdon 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Baxter Village 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Engineering Constructors, Inc. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vital Consulting Group 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haskins Electric - NM 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCR Premier Distributing Company 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR Bushman Equipment 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Doylestown Health Care Center 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Safe Air Dowco 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IMPACTLIFE - Burlington 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Star Enterprises, Inc. 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynojet Research MT 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt & Whitney Edwards AFB 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.