Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

The Watermark at Logan Square

Philadelphia, PA · ~242 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Watermark at Logan Square runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Watermark at Logan Square: 9.4 TCR = 247% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Watermark at Logan Square safety composite

The Watermark at Logan Square scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Watermark at Logan Square: 7.1 → 13.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2022

The Watermark at Logan Square's TCR rose 6.7 from 7.1 in 2016 to 13.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 247% of ind

  • DART 13.1 DART
  • RANK #144/233
  • PHOTO Brookdale Rock Springs
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 77 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Rock Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Watermark at Logan Square in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Watermark at Logan Square averages 9.4 TCR (247% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Watermark at Logan Square TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=16 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=13.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Watermark at Logan Square falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

The Watermark at Logan Square (242 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Watermark at Logan Square
The Watermark at Logan Square (242 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Watermark at Logan Square has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.8 13.1 8 11 0
2021 9.3 9.3 13 0 0
2020 16.0 16.0 10 14 0
2019 9.2 6.6 13 5 0
2018 6.7 4.3 14 0 0
2017 3.7 2.8 7 1 0
2016 7.1 5.9 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Philadelphia

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rock Springs 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Chanate 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgeway on German 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covell Gardens 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knouse Foods orrtanna 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulse Technologies 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Truck-Lite Co., LLC 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoprite 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR Covell Gardens 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville Division 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dircks Moving & Logistics, LLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR HL Munn Lumber 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA Chatsworth GA MFG & Gen Office 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bes 901 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE I Supply Company 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Hornell 017 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.