Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Pennsylvania

Broomall Presbyterian Village

Broomall, PA · ~242 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Broomall Presbyterian Village runs at 185% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Broomall Presbyterian Village: 12.0 TCR = 185% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Broomall Presbyterian Village safety composite

Broomall Presbyterian Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2018

Broomall Presbyterian Village injury rate improved

Broomall Presbyterian Village's TCR fell 11.5 from 16.6 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.6 · 2017=14.4 · 2018=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Broomall, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.0 · 185% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #606/754
  • PHOTO Avamere Olympic Reha…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Avamere Olympic Rehabillition of Sequim (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Broomall Presbyterian Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Broomall Presbyterian Village averages 12.0 TCR (185% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Broomall Presbyterian Village TCR series: 2016=16.6 · 2017=14.4 · 2018=5.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Broomall Presbyterian Village falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #606 safest of 754 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Pennsylvania.

Broomall Presbyterian Village (242 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Broomall Presbyterian Village
Broomall Presbyterian Village (242 employees, TCR 12.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Broomall Presbyterian Village has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.1 4.5 8 0 0
2017 14.4 11.3 22 1 0
2016 16.6 11.9 24 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Broomall

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 39 employers in Broomall, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Avamere Olympic Rehabillition of Sequim 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consulate Health Care 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Elizabeth Home 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Paul Health Center 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Knouse Foods orrtanna 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulse Technologies 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Truck-Lite Co., LLC 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoprite 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6523 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106523 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Broomall Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6309 169 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City Store #714 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 5072 - OR Washington County Jail 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SD,VERMILLION - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 12.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilbert Partners, LLC 12.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Neenah Paper Whiting 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 11 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mia Hub 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.