Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

The Waters of Edina

Edina, MN · ~75 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waters of Edina runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Waters of Edina: 5.3 TCR = 139% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waters of Edina safety composite

The Waters of Edina scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2023

The Waters of Edina injury rate improved

The Waters of Edina's TCR fell 4.0 from 12.5 in 2016 to 8.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.5 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2023=8.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Edina, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 139% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #84/240
  • PHOTO TXWAC2 ASCENSION LIV…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXWAC2 ASCENSION LIVING PROVIDENCE VILLAGE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Waters of Edina in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waters of Edina averages 5.3 TCR (139% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waters of Edina TCR series: 2016=12.5 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0 · 2023=8.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waters of Edina falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #84 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Waters of Edina (75 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waters of Edina
The Waters of Edina (75 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Waters of Edina has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.5 8.5 5 0 0
2021 - - 0 0 0
2020 - - 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.1 0.1 8 0 0
2016 12.5 12.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Edina

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 201 employers in Edina, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXWAC2 ASCENSION LIVING PROVIDENCE VILLAGE 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63003 SUNRISE OF MADISON 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63039 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLAS OF HIGHLAND CROSSING 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crossroad Construction, Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE BCI Construction, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Asphalt Services, LLC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE M. G. McGrath, Inc. Glass & Glazing 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV Southdale Hospital 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schoenecker's Inc d.b.a BI WORLDWIDE 1,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Fire Protection Group 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313 - Edina 621 FTE
NAT-TCR Onion River Cooperative, DBA City Market Downtown 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkdale Mills, Inc. Plant 36-37 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hmf Express Atl 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Republic Services of Alderson 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dan Vaden Chevrolet Brunswick 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polymer Injection Molding 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Encapsys, LLC Appleton 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knickerbocker Group 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.