Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

The Waters of Highland Park

St. Paul, MN · ~54 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waters of Highland Park runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Waters of Highland Park: 3.6 TCR = 94% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waters of Highland Park safety composite

The Waters of Highland Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2023

The Waters of Highland Park injury rate improved

The Waters of Highland Park's TCR fell 2.1 from 8.1 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · St. Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 94% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #52/240
  • PHOTO Foxberry Terrace
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Foxberry Terrace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

The Waters of Highland Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waters of Highland Park averages 3.6 TCR (94% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waters of Highland Park TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=0 · 2022=0.1 · 2023=6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waters of Highland Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

The Waters of Highland Park (54 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waters of Highland Park
The Waters of Highland Park (54 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Waters of Highland Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2022 0.1 0.1 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 8.1 8.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · St. Paul

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 370 employers in St. Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Foxberry Terrace 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63047 SUNRISE OF SAN MATEO 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63064 SUNRISE OF YORBA LINDA 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside East 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monticello Training Center 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 09 Eveleth 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elder-Jones Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haldeman Homme, Inc. - Minneapolis - Corporate 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR YCID 5,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 5,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Hospital 3,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR IT Campus 2,409 FTE
NAT-TCR Cox Transportation Services LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 12611-Merced 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Services 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Chemical Concord Plates 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Queens Village Work Location-NYAK 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Luvata Appleton Lawe St. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triad Engineering & Contracting 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inland Empire Distribution Systems. Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.