Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Ohio

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing

Cincinnati, OH · ~63 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing: 7.7 TCR = 201% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing safety composite

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2020

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing injury rate improved

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing's TCR fell 2.8 from 5.2 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2019=15.5 · 2020=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.7 · 201% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #162/234
  • PHOTO St. Joseph of the Pi…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Joseph of the Pines Health Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Wellington at North Bend Crossing averages 7.7 TCR (201% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2019=15.5 · 2020=2.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Wellington at North Bend Crossing falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #162 safest of 234 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing (63 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Wellington at North Bend Crossing
The Wellington at North Bend Crossing (63 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Wellington at North Bend Crossing has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.3 2.3 0 1 0
2019 15.5 15.5 6 0 0
2017 5.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OH · Cincinnati

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph of the Pines Health Center 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Sterling Heights 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Terrace Assisted Living of North Mankato 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Winds of Urbana 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nicholson Builders 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buckeye Pipeline Construction, Inc 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTHSTAR ASPHALT, INC. 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Overhead Door Company of Reading, Pa (Rowens Enterprises) 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Osco Incorporated 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Parker Adventist Hospital 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 36 Monterey 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thrift Books Global, LLC (Phoenix, AZ) 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goossen Farms Inc 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Donnell Corporation 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.