Neutron activation analysis instruments manufacturing · Colorado

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Neutron activation analysis instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Neutron activation analysis instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs safety composite

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs held a steady TCR band

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/7
  • PHOTO Bruker Nano Surfaces…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bruker Nano Surfaces - Madison (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Neutron activation analysis instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs falls in its industry

213 Neutron activation analysis in establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 7 Neutron activation analysis in employers in Colorado.

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs (29 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs
Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs (29 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Thermo Fisher Scientific - Colorado Springs has fewer employees than the Neutron activation analysis instruments median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · CO · Colorado Springs

213 Neutron activation analysis instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bruker Nano Surfaces - Madison 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher PAI 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FEI - Thermo Fisher 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewater/Norwood 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Potato Colorado 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Denver 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veeman Dairy, LLLP 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Comanche 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brad & Kim Dalrymple, Inc. 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Albany Airport 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Little Knife Field 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Nacogdoches 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.