Radiation detection and monitoring instruments manufacturing · Ohio

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Oakwood, OH · ~100 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo Fisher Scientific runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Radiation detection and monitoring instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Thermo Fisher Scientific: 0.4 TCR = 13% of Radiation detection and monitoring instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo Fisher Scientific safety composite

Thermo Fisher Scientific scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2021→2024

Thermo Fisher Scientific injury rate improved

Thermo Fisher Scientific's TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Oakwood, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Dynamic Systems INC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dynamic Systems INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Thermo Fisher Scientific in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo Fisher Scientific averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Radiation detection and monitoring instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo Fisher Scientific TCR series: 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thermo Fisher Scientific falls in its industry

128 Radiation detection and monito establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Radiation detection and monito employers in Ohio.

Thermo Fisher Scientific (100 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo Fisher Scientific
Thermo Fisher Scientific (100 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Thermo Fisher Scientific has more employees than the Radiation detection and monitoring instr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · OH · Oakwood

128 Radiation detection and monitoring instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 13 employers in Oakwood, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dynamic Systems INC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Scientific Corporation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draeger, Inc. - Houston 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENMET LLC 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHEASTERN - NORTHEAST SHOP 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Locations 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miles-McClellan Construction Company, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Pipeline Services 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Farms Cooked Meats 593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hatchery 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR 104 Oakwood 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crystal Clear Building Services, Inc. 113 FTE
NAT-TCR Facility 2 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR North Valley High School 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TriStruX 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Norton Shores 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winward Electrical Services INC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chase Memorial Nursing Home & Rehab 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Owsley Health Care Center, Inc 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Weitz Company, LLC. - Mission Critical 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.