Diagnostic substances, in-vitro, manufacturing · California

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility

Pleasanton, CA · ~634 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Diagnostic substances, in-vitro, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Diagnostic substances, in-vitro, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility safety composite

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2020

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility injury rate improved

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.2 in 2019 to 0.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.2 · 2020=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #15/50
  • PHOTO Promega Corp
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~634 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Promega Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Diagnostic substances, in-vitro, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility TCR series: 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility falls in its industry

201 Diagnostic substances, in-vitr establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 50 Diagnostic substances, in-vitr employers in California.

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility (634 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility
Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility (634 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility has more employees than the Diagnostic substances, in-vitro, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.6 0.3 4 0 0
2019 1.2 0.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · CA · Pleasanton

201 Diagnostic substances, in-vitro, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Promega Corp 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems Baltimore 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walpole Site 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newark Site 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Paragon Framing Inc 634 FTE
STATE-SIZE LLM HQ 634 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casino M8trix 634 FTE
STATE-SIZE King Taco Restaurant, Inc. 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort St. Vrain Station 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Pipeline- IL 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McDonald Electrical Corp 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 440 AO Smith McBee SC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dbo1 634 FTE
NAT-SIZE KME 634 FTE
NAT-SIZE Illinois Valley Community Hospital 634 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Flyer of America 634 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.