Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services · Florida

Thermo King of Orlando

Winter Garden, FL · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo King of Orlando runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Thermo King of Orlando: 1.9 TCR = 89% of Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo King of Orlando safety composite

Thermo King of Orlando scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Thermo King of Orlando injury rate improved

Thermo King of Orlando's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Winter Garden, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 89% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/122
  • PHOTO Cinnaminson
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cinnaminson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Thermo King of Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo King of Orlando averages 1.9 TCR (89% of the Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo King of Orlando TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Thermo King of Orlando falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equip establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 122 Commercial refrigeration equip employers in Florida.

Thermo King of Orlando (41 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo King of Orlando
Thermo King of Orlando (41 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Thermo King of Orlando has fewer employees than the Commercial refrigeration equipment repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 4.8 2.4 2 0 0
2020 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · FL · Winter Garden

2,560 Commercial refrigeration equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 96 employers in Winter Garden, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cinnaminson 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany EM/Rental 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardner Denver, Inc. Odessa 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cameron 8840 Meldrum Lane 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oceans, Reefs & Aquariums, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE CO1 Cocoa Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Odessa Transmission Operations 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Trace 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 110 407 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2264 - Winter Garden 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Winter Garden 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 110 311 FTE
NAT-TCR Springfield - 35 Heywood Street 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Modesto Facility 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR VDF Field Building 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arnan - Oneonta 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brentwood 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE NIL 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE XJN 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.