Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Tennessee

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc.

Chattanooga, TN · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. safety composite

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 2.8 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Nucfil llc dba NFT
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucfil llc dba NFT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. falls in its industry

355 Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manu establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manu employers in Tennessee.

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc.
Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Company, Inc. has more employees than the Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 4.3 2.8 3 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.1 1.0 2 0 0
2016 2.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · TN · Chattanooga

355 Tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucfil llc dba NFT 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ward Vessel And Exchanger 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CST Industries, Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kingsport Service Center 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forcum Lannom Contractors, LLC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&S Construction 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE construction 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Des Moines (BAMG) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo King of Orlando 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pelham Plastics Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield - 35 Heywood Street 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Roseville Hall/Library 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Offshore International, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amelia Farm 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paulo - Headquarters 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.