Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing · Georgia

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill

Atlanta, GA · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing workplace, earning a grade C.

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill safety composite

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill held a steady TCR band

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327320 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/55
  • PHOTO Ozinga Bros., Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ozinga Bros., Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill falls in its industry

1,316 Ready-mix concrete manufacturi establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 55 Ready-mix concrete manufacturi employers in Georgia.

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill
Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Ben Hill has fewer employees than the Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327320 · GA · Atlanta

1,316 Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ozinga Bros., Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMC Addison 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 3/4 - Round Rock 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TX/NM Region Admin 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon Pullet 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clermont Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSSMAN APIARIES LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Freeport Place 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Intermountain West Contractors 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maine Course Hospitality Group - Pawtucket Hampton Inn 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Finney County PBX 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.