Food service contractors, cafeteria · Utah

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE

Salt Lake City, UT · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE runs at 443% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food service contractors, cafeteria workplace, earning a grade F.

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE: 13.3 TCR = 443% of Food service contractors, cafeteria BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE safety composite

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE: 6.6 → 18.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 30.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.38× in 2024

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE's TCR rose 11.8 from 6.6 in 2019 to 18.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 30.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Salt Lake City, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 443% of ind

  • DART 18.4 DART
  • RANK #26/27
  • PHOTO GOOD SAMARITAN MEDIC…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE averages 13.3 TCR (443% of the Food service contractors, cafeteria BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE TCR series: 2019=6.6 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=30.8 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=18.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE falls in its industry

6,952 Food service contractors, cafe establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 27 Food service contractors, cafe employers in Utah.

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE (31 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE
Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE (31 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Thomas Cuisine @ BIO FIRE has fewer employees than the Food service contractors, cafeteria median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.4 18.4 2 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2022 30.8 30.8 7 0 0
2021 6.4 3.2 2 0 0
2019 6.6 3.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · UT · Salt Lake City

6,952 Food service contractors, cafeteria employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legends - Ak Chin Pavilion 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT LEHIGH VALLEY HSP-CLINICAL 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ARBOR - WOODLAND COMMUNITY CONSOL. SCHOOL DIST. 50 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00543 LAKE SIDE PLANT 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE KEARNS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Firmage Water Conditioning 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Builders Inc. 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Stoughton Trailers LLC Plant 5 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dearborn Sausage Company Inc 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1248 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Region Construction 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pomp's Tire - Lincoln 143 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pompano Beach One Hour Air Conditioning & Heating 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Naples One Hour Air Conditioning & Heating 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Venice Residential 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.