Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · New York

Thomas Johnson, Inc.

Orchard Park, NY · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Johnson, Inc. runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

Thomas Johnson, Inc.: 3.8 TCR = 131% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Johnson, Inc. safety composite

Thomas Johnson, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2021→2024

Thomas Johnson, Inc. injury rate improved

Thomas Johnson, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Orchard Park, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 131% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #158/218
  • PHOTO Gundlach Champion, I…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gundlach Champion, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Johnson, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Johnson, Inc. averages 3.8 TCR (131% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Johnson, Inc. TCR series: 2021=5.3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Thomas Johnson, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #158 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in New York.

Thomas Johnson, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Johnson, Inc.
Thomas Johnson, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Thomas Johnson, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.9 4.6 3 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2021 5.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Orchard Park

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 72 employers in Orchard Park, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gundlach Champion, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCSF 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-State Building & Supply Co., Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR A L Baumgartner Construction Inc 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Bliss, NY 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brightly Farms, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Jacket Orchards 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barbland Dairy LLC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Systems Orchard Park 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSD ORCHARD PARK 448 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGard llc 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 Cobham 420 FTE
NAT-TCR Lodge of the Ozarks 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Seward 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lone Star Bakery Inc. Plant 1 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hacker Valley 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altium Packaging - Chino 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Extreme Panel Technologies 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE GTA Drywall, Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.