Reformulating plastics resins from recycled plastics products · California

Altium Packaging - Chino

Chino, CA · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Altium Packaging - Chino runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Reformulating plastics resins from recycled plastics products workplace, earning a grade B.

Altium Packaging - Chino: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Reformulating plastics resins from recycled plastics products BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Altium Packaging - Chino safety composite

Altium Packaging - Chino scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Altium Packaging - Chino: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Altium Packaging - Chino's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2021 to 3.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Chino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO HP1
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HP1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Altium Packaging - Chino in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Altium Packaging - Chino averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Reformulating plastics resins from recycled plastics products BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Altium Packaging - Chino TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Altium Packaging - Chino falls in its industry

342 Reformulating plastics resins establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Reformulating plastics resins employers in California.

Altium Packaging - Chino (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Altium Packaging - Chino
Altium Packaging - Chino (47 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Altium Packaging - Chino has fewer employees than the Reformulating plastics resins from recyc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · CA · Chino

342 Reformulating plastics resins from recycled plastics products employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HP1 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fryman's Recycling 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACC 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primex Plastics Color & Compounding Garfield 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR Experi-Metal Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation Building 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Crane Composites - Goshen Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR John Fayard Moving & Warehousing, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hacker Valley 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Johnson, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE E & B PAVING LLC - Evansville 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reindl Printing Inc 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.