Manufacturing Building Construction · South Carolina

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin

Sumter, SC · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Manufacturing Building Construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin: 1.9 TCR = 67% of Manufacturing Building Construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin safety composite

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2019

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Sumter, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/37
  • PHOTO Schaaf Window Co Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schaaf Window Co Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin averages 1.9 TCR (67% of the Manufacturing Building Construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin falls in its industry

924 Manufacturing Building Constru establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 37 Manufacturing Building Constru employers in South Carolina.

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin (46 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin
Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin (46 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Thompson Construction Group Inc Caterpillar Pin has fewer employees than the Manufacturing Building Construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · SC · Sumter

924 Manufacturing Building Construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 130 employers in Sumter, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schaaf Window Co Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RDA Services Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Construction Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corden Pharma Boulder 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mitchell Brothers, Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horizon LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regional Utility Services 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE All In One Insulation 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Tuomey 1,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumter Utilities, Inc. 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental Tire the Americas LLC - Sumter Plant 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Cheshire Building 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 272 - Kirkwood 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Schneider Electric - Lincoln, Nebraska 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Superior Grocers # 131 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sioux Corporation Beresford 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0017 2396 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0005 0390 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6962-Swy 0025 2208 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.