Motor homes, self-contained, assembling on purchased chassis · Indiana

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination

Elkhart, IN · ~218 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination runs at 472% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor homes, self-contained, assembling on purchased chassis workplace, earning a grade F.

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination: 15.6 TCR = 472% of Motor homes, self-contained, assembling on purchased chassis BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination safety composite

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.4

2016→2019

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination injury rate improved

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination's TCR fell 13.4 from 18.0 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.0 · 2017=25.7 · 2018=14.0 · 2019=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336213 · Elkhart, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 472% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #65/66
  • PHOTO Thor Motor Coach/Pla…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~218 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thor Motor Coach/Plant 350 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination averages 15.6 TCR (472% of the Motor homes, self-contained, assembling on purchased chassis BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination TCR series: 2016=18 · 2017=25.7 · 2018=14 · 2019=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination falls in its industry

97 Motor homes, self-contained, a establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 66 Motor homes, self-contained, a employers in Indiana.

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination (218 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination
Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination (218 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Thor Motor Coach/Elkhart lamination has more employees than the Motor homes, self-contained, assembling median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.6 2.3 4 0 0
2018 14.0 11.0 19 0 0
2017 25.7 23.0 47 0 0
2016 18.0 8.1 30 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336213 · IN · Elkhart

97 Motor homes, self-contained, assembling on purchased chassis employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thor Motor Coach/Plant 350 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone RV Plant 700 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dutchmen Plant 830 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone RV Plant 20 12.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Small Parts Inc. 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone RV Plant 23 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE 021-00989 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Becton Dickinson 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR Glacier Landscape, Inc. 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Luzia-Site 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stony Brook 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CSC Enterprises, Incorporated d/b/a 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hotard Coaches - Sulphur 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8000 Coborn's Delivers 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAHS - Baker City 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tyco- JCI Warehouse, Lithia Springs 218 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.