Ultrasonic scanning devices, medical, manufacturing · Oregon

THORTEX

Portland, OR · ~172 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

THORTEX runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Ultrasonic scanning devices, medical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

THORTEX: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Ultrasonic scanning devices, medical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

THORTEX safety composite

THORTEX scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2022

THORTEX injury rate improved

THORTEX's TCR fell 3.2 from 4.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=1.2 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Glencoe Minnesota
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glencoe Minnesota (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

THORTEX in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows THORTEX averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Ultrasonic scanning devices, medical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

THORTEX TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=1.2 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where THORTEX falls in its industry

242 Ultrasonic scanning devices, m establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Ultrasonic scanning devices, m employers in Oregon.

THORTEX (172 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate THORTEX
THORTEX (172 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

THORTEX has fewer employees than the Ultrasonic scanning devices, medical, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2017 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2016 4.0 3.3 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · OR · Portland

242 Ultrasonic scanning devices, medical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glencoe Minnesota 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FUJIFILM HEALTHCARE PERFORMANCE CONTROLS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acutus Medical, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Bionics Ave Hall 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE SWY-0019-0019-01751 FAC-01751-MOLALLA-OR 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Troutdale Terminal 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE HERMISTON CENTER (ORHRM) 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE OMCC GROUP SALES 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Athol 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mason County PUD No. 3 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri Tech Laboratories LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR M5021 Fountains@Bro 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 10567 DePaul 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnetonka PN Clinic Carlson 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bickels Snack Foods 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fire-Dex 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.