Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · New York

ThreeC Logistics LLC

Suffern, NY · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ThreeC Logistics LLC runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

ThreeC Logistics LLC: 10.6 TCR = 163% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ThreeC Logistics LLC safety composite

ThreeC Logistics LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ThreeC Logistics LLC: 7.1 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2024

ThreeC Logistics LLC's TCR rose 6.9 from 7.1 in 2022 to 14.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Suffern, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.6 · 163% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #276/356
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DSD3 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

ThreeC Logistics LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ThreeC Logistics LLC averages 10.6 TCR (163% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ThreeC Logistics LLC TCR series: 2022=7.1 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=14 · BLS 6.5

Where ThreeC Logistics LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #276 safest of 356 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in New York.

ThreeC Logistics LLC (70 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate ThreeC Logistics LLC
ThreeC Logistics LLC (70 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

ThreeC Logistics LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.0 12.4 9 0 0
2023 10.6 10.6 6 0 0
2022 7.1 7.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NY · Suffern

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 23 employers in Suffern, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DSD3 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORHAR - BROOKINGS 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WAVAN - VANCOUVER 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAKE WALES CENTER (FLLKW) 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Samascott Orchards LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westchester 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Sol Contracting/El Sol Ltd. Ent. JV 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Callahan Paving Corp. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 1,749 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockland Community College 690 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bon Secours Medical Group PC 448 FTE
CITY-NEAR BSCHS Medical Group,PC 429 FTE
NAT-TCR Austin Operations 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ewing Hauling 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Marietta II, LLC (Tower Road) 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR IBC Engineered Materials 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mid-West Spring & Stamping 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE BOS Automotive Products, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Danco Construction Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bill Gillespie Electric, Inc. 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.