Distribution of electric power · Michigan

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan

Ubly, MI · ~40 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan runs at 389% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan: 4.7 TCR = 389% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan safety composite

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2018→2024

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan injury rate improved

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan's TCR fell 5.5 from 10.4 in 2018 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.4 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Ubly, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 389% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #57/63
  • PHOTO 32 Hibbard
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 32 Hibbard (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan averages 4.7 TCR (389% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan TCR series: 2018=10.4 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 63 Distribution of electric power employers in Michigan.

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan (40 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan
Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan (40 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 1.6 3 0 0
2023 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 10.4 7.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MI · Ubly

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 8 employers in Ubly, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 32 Hibbard 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kandiyohi Power Cooperative 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Operating - 3610 Gentian Boulevard Columbus, GA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BROCKTON-MA60 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Basket Orchards, Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville, MI 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan & Jerrys Pineview Greenhouse LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Rapids Service Center 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Enterprises 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR VALLEY ENTERPRISES-UBLY INC 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEPRO ENTERPRISES INC 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gemini Plastics, Inc. 204 FTE
NAT-TCR Roof Services A Tecta America Company LLC Richmond unit 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD082 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RPM Wood Finishes Group, Inc., Hudson, NC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Home2 Suites Bloomington 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silverado Tustin Hacienda - 230 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cresline Northwest, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE DH Pace Door Services - Orlando 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1281 PYP Monrovia 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.