Phone Center - Cookie Delivery Business · Texas

Tiff's Treats - Command Center

Austin, TX · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tiff's Treats - Command Center runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Phone Center - Cookie Delivery Business workplace, earning a grade C.

Tiff's Treats - Command Center: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Phone Center - Cookie Delivery Business BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tiff's Treats - Command Center safety composite

Tiff's Treats - Command Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tiff's Treats - Command Center held a steady TCR band

Tiff's Treats - Command Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445291 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/49
  • PHOTO Tiff's Treats - Corp…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tiff's Treats - Corporate (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tiff's Treats - Command Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tiff's Treats - Command Center averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Phone Center - Cookie Delivery Business BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tiff's Treats - Command Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Tiff's Treats - Command Center falls in its industry

65 Phone Center - Cookie Delivery establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 49 Phone Center - Cookie Delivery employers in Texas.

Tiff's Treats - Command Center (49 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 22 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tiff's Treats - Command Center
Tiff's Treats - Command Center (49 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 22 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Tiff's Treats - Command Center has more employees than the Phone Center - Cookie Delivery Business median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445291 · TX · Austin

65 Phone Center - Cookie Delivery Business employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tiff's Treats - Corporate 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tiff's Treats - D7 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crumbl Enterprises LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tiff`s Treats - H1 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WOLF CREEK FEED YARD 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Feedyard 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spandet Dairy Friona 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vist Grande Dairy 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE OFS Plant #11 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Styline Logistics North Carolina 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Material Exchange, Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boise - BMD 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.