Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid · Texas

Tiger Sanitation, Inc.

San Antonio, TX · ~165 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

Tiger Sanitation, Inc.: 7.9 TCR = 305% of Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. safety composite

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tiger Sanitation, Inc.: 6.4 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2021

Tiger Sanitation, Inc.'s TCR rose 2.8 from 6.4 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 305% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #102/117
  • PHOTO Area Disposal Servic…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Area Disposal Service Inc. Morton HC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tiger Sanitation, Inc. averages 7.9 TCR (305% of the Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=5.4 · 2018=6.8 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=9.2 · BLS 2.6

Where Tiger Sanitation, Inc. falls in its industry

2,322 Waste collection services, non establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 117 Waste collection services, non employers in Texas.

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. (165 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tiger Sanitation, Inc.
Tiger Sanitation, Inc. (165 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Tiger Sanitation, Inc. has more employees than the Waste collection services, nonhazardous median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.2 6.0 25 1 0
2020 13.2 8.8 18 9 0
2019 6.5 6.5 13 0 0
2018 6.8 5.7 12 0 0
2017 5.4 3.6 9 0 0
2016 6.4 5.9 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · TX · San Antonio

2,322 Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Area Disposal Service Inc. Morton HC 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05354 - WI Antigo/Wausau 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR S03175 - WM Toms River Hauling 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waste Industries Vance-Granville 7.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE PDD-Baird Ct. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG HOU 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Worley Field Services at Eastman Chemical Company 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE OQ Chemicals Corporation Bay City TX 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR LP Tarpon Springs, LLC 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Forest Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bongards Creameries - Perham 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Iron Mountain Industries, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plaskolite Rotuba Profiles 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Erie Facility 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterproofing Associates 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE 152 New York Gallery 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.