Single-family detached housing construction general contractors · North Carolina

Timberlake SE

Huntersville, NC · ~96 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timberlake SE runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Single-family detached housing construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Timberlake SE: 1.0 TCR = 27% of Single-family detached housing construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timberlake SE safety composite

Timberlake SE scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Timberlake SE: 0.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Timberlake SE's TCR rose 2.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Huntersville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 27% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #10/20
  • PHOTO D.R. Horton, Inc. - …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D.R. Horton, Inc. - Mississippi/Mobile (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Timberlake SE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timberlake SE averages 1.0 TCR (27% of the Single-family detached housing construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timberlake SE TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Timberlake SE falls in its industry

976 Single-family detached housing establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Single-family detached housing employers in North Carolina.

Timberlake SE (96 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Timberlake SE
Timberlake SE (96 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Timberlake SE has more employees than the Single-family detached housing construct median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2023 1.9 0.9 2 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · NC · Huntersville

976 Single-family detached housing construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 117 employers in Huntersville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D.R. Horton, Inc. - Mississippi/Mobile 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrity Companies LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hayden Homes LLC - OR 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intown 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eanes Heating and Air 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Blanchers, dba Olam Edible Nuts Edenton Facility 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Bern 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrisburg NC Truss 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGuire Nuclear 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntersville Field Support Center 929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metrolina Greenhouses - Huntersville NC 725 FTE
NAT-TCR Lennar Jacksonville 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Allen Road Center 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MFA Incorporated - Home Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DEL 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCARBOROUGH 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0508 Shrewsbury 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vistar Kansas City - 1094 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynch Road Service Center 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.