Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Massachusetts

Timberline Construction Corporation

Canton, MA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Timberline Construction Corporation runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Timberline Construction Corporation: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Timberline Construction Corporation safety composite

Timberline Construction Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Timberline Construction Corporation held a steady TCR band

Timberline Construction Corporation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Canton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/100
  • PHOTO Tripp Enterprises Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tripp Enterprises Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Timberline Construction Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Timberline Construction Corporation averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Timberline Construction Corporation TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Timberline Construction Corporation falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 100 Construction management, comme employers in Massachusetts.

Timberline Construction Corporation (57 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Timberline Construction Corporation
Timberline Construction Corporation (57 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Timberline Construction Corporation has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MA · Canton

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 98 employers in Canton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tripp Enterprises Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison Construction 2016 OSHA 300 & 300A 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tepcon Construction Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilbane Building Company Houston 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delphi Construction Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbert & Becker Co., Inc 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE John F. Shea Co., Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Office - Main 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Canton 4,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Locations) 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.M. Duggan, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sutter Care at Home (247-YUBA2) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7526-Enphg-Delaware Valley College 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Bloomingdale Police Department 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE IAC Fort Worth 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.