Physical properties testing and inspection equipment manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company

Horsham, PA · ~116 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Physical properties testing and inspection equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company: 0.9 TCR = 29% of Physical properties testing and inspection equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company safety composite

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2019→2023

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company injury rate improved

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Horsham, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO Telog Instruments, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Telog Instruments, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company averages 0.9 TCR (29% of the Physical properties testing and inspection equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company falls in its industry

128 Physical properties testing an establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Physical properties testing an employers in Pennsylvania.

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company (116 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company
Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company (116 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company has more employees than the Physical properties testing and inspecti median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · PA · Horsham

128 Physical properties testing and inspection equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 82 employers in Horsham, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Telog Instruments, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Omega Engineering, Pressure Division 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenck USA Corp. - HQ Deer Park 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interface 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pietro Industries Inc 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jendoco Construction Corporation 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE HHC 1882 Winfield 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rabe Environmental Systems, Inc. 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janssen Biotech Inc Horsham 2,557 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAWLG - WILLOW GROVE 2,382 FTE
CITY-NEAR WILLOW GROVE (PAWLG) 2,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Janssen Horsham 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR Ducommun - Tulsa 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dunseith Community Nursing Home 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Roofing Products 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Joseph Rizzo & Sons Construction Co 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holt Senior Care and Rehabilitation Center 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battaglia Electric, Inc. 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE BT Baltimore 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wesley Court Senior Living 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.