Distribution of electric power · Mississippi

Tippah Electric Power Association

Ripley, MS · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tippah Electric Power Association runs at 400% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Tippah Electric Power Association: 4.8 TCR = 400% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tippah Electric Power Association safety composite

Tippah Electric Power Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.2

2017→2024

Tippah Electric Power Association injury rate improved

Tippah Electric Power Association's TCR fell 14.2 from 17.8 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=17.8 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Ripley, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.8 · 400% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #53/65
  • PHOTO Orangeburg Departmen…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orangeburg Department of Public Utilities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Tippah Electric Power Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tippah Electric Power Association averages 4.8 TCR (400% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tippah Electric Power Association TCR series: 2017=17.8 · 2018=5 · 2019=6.4 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Tippah Electric Power Association falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 65 Distribution of electric power employers in Mississippi.

Tippah Electric Power Association (47 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tippah Electric Power Association
Tippah Electric Power Association (47 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Tippah Electric Power Association has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2023 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2018 5.0 2.5 2 0 0
2017 17.8 10.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MS · Ripley

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 27 employers in Ripley, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orangeburg Department of Public Utilities 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dixie Electric Cooperative 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menomonie Service Center-1P 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Walpole 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clinton Network 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moss Point MS 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.N.P.,INC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Builders Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ripley Facility 1,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Furniture Ind. LLC Ripley Facility 865 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ripley 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tippah County Hospital 244 FTE
NAT-TCR Promet Processing Corporation 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harner Plumbing, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vancrest of Eaton 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TR Pipe Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Millwood, Inc. Waverly 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE TownePlace Suites 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garrett Liners Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raynor Company Group 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.