Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing · Ohio

Titan Tire of Bryan

Bryan, OH · ~165 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Titan Tire of Bryan runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Titan Tire of Bryan: 9.8 TCR = 297% of Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Titan Tire of Bryan safety composite

Titan Tire of Bryan scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Titan Tire of Bryan: 9.3 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 15.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2021

Titan Tire of Bryan's TCR rose 2.0 from 9.3 in 2016 to 11.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326211 · Bryan, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 297% of ind

  • DART 10.5 DART
  • RANK #17/17
  • PHOTO Yokohama Tire Manufa…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 98 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yokohama Tire Manufacturing VA (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Titan Tire of Bryan in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Titan Tire of Bryan averages 9.8 TCR (297% of the Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Titan Tire of Bryan TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=13.4 · 2018=15.5 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=11.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Titan Tire of Bryan falls in its industry

114 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-p establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 17 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-p employers in Ohio.

Titan Tire of Bryan (165 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Titan Tire of Bryan
Titan Tire of Bryan (165 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 393 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Titan Tire of Bryan has fewer employees than the Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 11.2 10.5 15 0 0
2020 3.7 2.3 5 0 0
2019 5.7 4.0 10 0 0
2018 15.5 13.3 29 0 0
2017 13.4 12.3 25 0 0
2016 9.3 6.6 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326211 · OH · Bryan

114 Tires (e.g., pneumatic, semi-pneumatic, solid rubber) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 56 employers in Bryan, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yokohama Tire Manufacturing VA 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECCT 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Human Technologies, Inc. Ardmore 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Tires of America (TN), LLC 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robertson Construction 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terrace Construction 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Shelly Company - NW Division Constructions and Operations 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mechanical Systems of Dayton Inc. 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spangler Candy Co. 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spangler Candy Co. (INC.) 447 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2191 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allied Moulded Products, Inc. 315 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Freight Lines, Inc. - San Antonio 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DAL - Inflight 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 234824-Joppa Po 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Westby Cooperative Creamery 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ascom (US) Inc. 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Ignatius Nursing & Rehab Center 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milwaukee Jones Island 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ingeteam, Inc. 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.