General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse

Greenville, SC · ~92 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse: 4.4 TCR = 75% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse safety composite

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse: 1.1 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2024

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse's TCR rose 3.8 from 1.1 in 2022 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 4.4 · 75% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #111/160
  • PHOTO Prime Now LLC - UPA1
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prime Now LLC - UPA1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows tkSCS Greenville - White Horse averages 4.4 TCR (75% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 5.8

Where tkSCS Greenville - White Horse falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse (92 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate tkSCS Greenville - White Horse
tkSCS Greenville - White Horse (92 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

tkSCS Greenville - White Horse has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 3.7 4 0 0
2023 7.2 7.2 6 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Greenville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - UPA1 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hopkins Distribution Company LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC7 DC7 RIDGEFIELD WA 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conns DC-Charlotte 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson's Roofing Service Inc 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE CarolinaPower Inc BR22 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amick Farms, LLC SC FeedMill 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Charleston Facility 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR P AND J, LLC dba JUMBO FOODS 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PAM Specialty of Wilkes Barre 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Electrical Contractors 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Norfolk SNF LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Balfour Beatty - Havelock Bypass 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Splash! At Lively Park 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roger Langeliers Construction Hillsboro 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Nashville, LLC (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - Nashville West) 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.