Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutiona · California

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc.

Compton, CA · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutiona workplace, earning a grade D.

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc.: 3.6 TCR = 124% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutiona BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. safety composite

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2021

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. injury rate improved

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Compton, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 124% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #318/486
  • PHOTO Boyle Construction M…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boyle Construction Management Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. averages 3.6 TCR (124% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutiona BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.9

Where TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #318 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc.
TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. (35 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

TLM Petro Labor Force, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.6 9.6 0 3 0
2019 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Compton

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutiona employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Compton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boyle Construction Management Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Bay Construction 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PNCI Construction Inc 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR VSP Construction Services Inc. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-017 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR 430-DC001 789 FTE
CITY-NEAR The People Concern - SOLAR 448 FTE
NAT-TCR AZ 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Health Partners - Sherman Campus 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR USCS- Lebanon, IN 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nagel Paper 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Cove at Marsh Landing 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE U-C Coatings LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller-Leaman HQ 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-673-Pottery Barn 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.