Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and polishing) metal and metal products for the trade · Ohio

Toledo

Toledo, OH · ~129 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Toledo runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and polishing) metal and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Toledo: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and polishing) metal and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Toledo safety composite

Toledo scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Toledo injury rate improved

Toledo's TCR fell 3.6 from 5.9 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Toledo, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #19/62
  • PHOTO Surface Finish Techn…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Surface Finish Technologies, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Toledo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Toledo averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and polishing) metal and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Toledo TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=5.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Toledo falls in its industry

585 Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and p establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 62 Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and p employers in Ohio.

Toledo (129 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Toledo
Toledo (129 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Toledo has more employees than the Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and polishing) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2020 1.4 1.4 2 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 5.9 4.9 6 0 0
2016 5.9 2.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · OH · Toledo

585 Tumbling (i.e., cleaning and polishing) metal and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 551 employers in Toledo, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Surface Finish Technologies, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nobert Plating Co 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontier Group Chino Valley 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Result Enterprises Inc, DBA High Tech Finishing 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firelands Technology Ventures, LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Messer Construction - Columbus, OH 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structsure Scaffold Solutions LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hartz Mountain Corporation 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Assembly Complex 5,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Toledo Hospital 5,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Promedica Downtown Headquarters 3,308 FTE
NAT-TCR MEPPI512-510 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AIRCRAFT GEAR CORPORATION - Plant 2 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #16 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 140 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 17601765 Lkq 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chippewa Falls Plant 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tindall Corporation - Mississippi Division 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Orleans 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.