Pretzels (except soft) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Tom Sturgis Pretzels

Reading, PA · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tom Sturgis Pretzels runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pretzels (except soft) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Tom Sturgis Pretzels: 6.7 TCR = 164% of Pretzels (except soft) manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tom Sturgis Pretzels safety composite

Tom Sturgis Pretzels scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Tom Sturgis Pretzels injury rate improved

Tom Sturgis Pretzels's TCR fell 2.5 from 16.2 in 2017 to 13.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.2 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=13.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311919 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 164% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #40/50
  • PHOTO CTC Site
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CTC Site (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Tom Sturgis Pretzels in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tom Sturgis Pretzels averages 6.7 TCR (164% of the Pretzels (except soft) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tom Sturgis Pretzels TCR series: 2017=16.2 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=10.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=13.7 · BLS 4.1

Where Tom Sturgis Pretzels falls in its industry

253 Pretzels (except soft) manufac establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 50 Pretzels (except soft) manufac employers in Pennsylvania.

Tom Sturgis Pretzels (34 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tom Sturgis Pretzels
Tom Sturgis Pretzels (34 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Tom Sturgis Pretzels has fewer employees than the Pretzels (except soft) manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.7 10.3 3 1 0
2023 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.3 10.3 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2018 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2017 16.2 12.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311919 · PA · Reading

253 Pretzels (except soft) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CTC Site 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aaron Thomas Company Jurupa Valley 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 2 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rudolph Foods Atlanta Plant 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kaolin Mushroom Farms - West Grove Facility 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Didden Greenhouse 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Dairy 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR TMP Technologies, Inc. Advanced Rubber Products Division 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexandria Store 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanitation District Agency 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CAD Cut - Denton 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE A.H. Stock Mfg. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Port Arthur Facility 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wrenshall City Hall 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiff's Treats - CS1 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.