Sewage treatment plants or facilities · California

Sanitation District Agency

Elk Grove, CA · ~403 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sanitation District Agency runs at 559% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sewage treatment plants or facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Sanitation District Agency: 6.7 TCR = 559% of Sewage treatment plants or facilities BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sanitation District Agency safety composite

Sanitation District Agency scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2024

Sanitation District Agency injury rate improved

Sanitation District Agency's TCR fell 1.7 from 5.3 in 2017 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 24.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=24.4 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Elk Grove, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 559% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #48/74
  • PHOTO Huntington Sanitary …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 100 inj
  • SIZE ~403 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huntington Sanitary Board (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sanitation District Agency in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sanitation District Agency averages 6.7 TCR (559% of the Sewage treatment plants or facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sanitation District Agency TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=24.4 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Sanitation District Agency falls in its industry

400 Sewage treatment plants or fac establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 74 Sewage treatment plants or fac employers in California.

Sanitation District Agency (403 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Sanitation District Agency
Sanitation District Agency (403 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Sanitation District Agency has more employees than the Sewage treatment plants or facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 12 0 0
2023 3.9 3.6 13 0 0
2022 24.4 23.2 18 62 0
2021 7.3 6.2 10 15 0
2020 3.3 3.3 12 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 9 0 0
2018 3.5 2.7 11 2 0
2017 5.3 3.7 15 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Elk Grove

400 Sewage treatment plants or facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 134 employers in Elk Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huntington Sanitary Board 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stickney Water Reclamation Plant 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fountain Hills Sanitary District 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Coyotes Water Reclamation Plant 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CN Irvine 403 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4818-48180004-13500 FOSTER RD-WC 403 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2245 403 FTE
STATE-SIZE 915 403 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - Sacramento 2,924 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 601 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CCHCS - 042 1,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - ELK GROVE 1,404 FTE
NAT-TCR Alexandria Store 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Tom Sturgis Pretzels 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TMP Technologies, Inc. Advanced Rubber Products Division 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR American Pulverizer Company 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oregon State Hospital-Junction City Campus 403 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tech Park 403 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston TX FXFE-HOU 403 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tomah Health 403 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.