Fire sprinkler system installation · Michigan

Total Fire Protection, Inc.

Grand Rapids, MI · ~212 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Total Fire Protection, Inc. runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fire sprinkler system installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Total Fire Protection, Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 54% of Fire sprinkler system installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Total Fire Protection, Inc. safety composite

Total Fire Protection, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Total Fire Protection, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Total Fire Protection, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.5 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #35/153
  • PHOTO Elliott-Lewis Corpor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elliott-Lewis Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Total Fire Protection, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Total Fire Protection, Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (54% of the Fire sprinkler system installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Total Fire Protection, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=2.8 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Total Fire Protection, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installa establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 153 Fire sprinkler system installa employers in Michigan.

Total Fire Protection, Inc. (212 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Total Fire Protection, Inc.
Total Fire Protection, Inc. (212 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Total Fire Protection, Inc. has more employees than the Fire sprinkler system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 2.1 1.6 4 0 0
2022 1.8 0.4 5 0 0
2021 1.7 0.4 4 0 0
2020 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2018 2.8 0.9 6 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MI · Grand Rapids

5,793 Fire sprinkler system installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elliott-Lewis Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACI Mechanical, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illinois Piping Corporation 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR John E. Green Company 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Progressive Mechanical, Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE FloraCraft Corporation Headquarters 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mold Masters Company 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nyloncraft 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Radix Wire & Cable - GW 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SCC Converting Center 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MH Indianapolis 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Longmont Plant 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foxdale Village 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Walls Inc-Charlotte 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Bay 29 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.