Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping · South Carolina

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville

Greenville, SC · ~105 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping workplace, earning a grade C.

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville: 6.1 TCR = 113% of Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville safety composite

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2017→2018

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville injury rate improved

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville's TCR fell 6.0 from 9.1 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.1 · 2018=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 113% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/11
  • PHOTO Hill Mfg
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hill Mfg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville averages 6.1 TCR (113% of the Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville TCR series: 2017=9.1 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville falls in its industry

510 Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 11 Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping employers in South Carolina.

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville (105 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville
Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville (105 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Greenville has fewer employees than the Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.1 0.0 5 0 0
2017 9.1 4.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · SC · Greenville

510 Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hill Mfg 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 2 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erdrich USA Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lansing Metal Center 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge Log Cabins LLC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Toray CMA Spartanburg SC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific Greenville SC 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amcor Blythewood 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jerry Brown's Auto Parts 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas RTS 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Birmingham (Altru) 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Newton Public Schools 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt- Hutchinson 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norwich Plant 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2900 Bcd 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.