Community development agencies, government · North Carolina

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community

Chapel Hill, NC · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community development agencies, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community: 8.7 TCR = 271% of Community development agencies, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community safety composite

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2018

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community injury rate improved

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community's TCR fell 5.5 from 15.8 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=10.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 925120 · Chapel Hill, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 271% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Parks, Recreation, F…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parks, Recreation, Facilities City of Wyoming (0.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community averages 8.7 TCR (271% of the Community development agencies, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community TCR series: 2016=15.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=10.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community falls in its industry

50 Community development agencies establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Community development agencies employers in North Carolina.

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community (20 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community
Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community (20 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community has fewer employees than the Community development agencies, governme median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.3 5.1 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 15.8 7.9 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

925120 · NC · Chapel Hill

50 Community development agencies, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 104 employers in Chapel Hill, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parks, Recreation, Facilities City of Wyoming 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works/Maintenance Building 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Decatur 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works - Maintenance Facility 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Steve Thomas Farms 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Smith Farms 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ron Richmond 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Family Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 21,973 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Health Care 11,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spec Personnel, LLC 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale chapel hill 509 FTE
NAT-TCR Select Painting & Decorating, Inc 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Estates, Inc. 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Paul Hub (Mnsph) 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 043 ABC Supply Co., Inc 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE GKN Kersey 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkside at Dr King School and HWS 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oliphant & Co. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE CCC 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.