Forklift repair and maintenance services · California

Toyota Material Handling Northern California

Livermore, CA · ~215 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Toyota Material Handling Northern California runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Forklift repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Toyota Material Handling Northern California: 4.0 TCR = 192% of Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Toyota Material Handling Northern California safety composite

Toyota Material Handling Northern California scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Toyota Material Handling Northern California: 2.9 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2021

Toyota Material Handling Northern California's TCR rose 1.6 from 2.9 in 2017 to 4.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 192% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #90/148
  • PHOTO Applied Dynamics
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applied Dynamics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Toyota Material Handling Northern California in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Toyota Material Handling Northern California averages 4.0 TCR (192% of the Forklift repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Toyota Material Handling Northern California TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=4.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Toyota Material Handling Northern California falls in its industry

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenanc establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 148 Forklift repair and maintenanc employers in California.

Toyota Material Handling Northern California (215 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Toyota Material Handling Northern California
Toyota Material Handling Northern California (215 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Toyota Material Handling Northern California has more employees than the Forklift repair and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.4 3.9 9 0 0
2020 5.3 4.3 11 0 0
2018 3.6 3.1 7 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CA · Livermore

2,560 Forklift repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applied Dynamics 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mathy Sparta Shop 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Louisville Branch 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MH Danville 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Camarillo 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Orchards-Eastside 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE 622 SAN MARCOS 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE YC Trucking 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR 64 Chester Street 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Del Rio Distribution Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Didion Ethanol 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlantic Central Distribution Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Berry Global Inc. (Pryor, OK Facility) 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valparaiso Ofc/Whse 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waupaca Foundry, Inc. Plant 7E Effingham 215 FTE
NAT-SIZE NRG- First AID 215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.