Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

TP Aerospace - Orlando

Orlando, FL · ~46 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TP Aerospace - Orlando runs at 235% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade F.

TP Aerospace - Orlando: 10.6 TCR = 235% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TP Aerospace - Orlando safety composite

TP Aerospace - Orlando scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TP Aerospace - Orlando: 2.5 → 14.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 14.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2023

TP Aerospace - Orlando's TCR rose 12.3 from 2.5 in 2021 to 14.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 235% of ind

  • DART 14.8 DART
  • RANK #131/137
  • PHOTO MCO-ITP
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MCO-ITP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

TP Aerospace - Orlando in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TP Aerospace - Orlando averages 10.6 TCR (235% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TP Aerospace - Orlando TCR series: 2021=2.5 · 2022=14.4 · 2023=14.8 · BLS 4.5

Where TP Aerospace - Orlando falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #131 safest of 137 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Florida.

TP Aerospace - Orlando (46 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TP Aerospace - Orlando
TP Aerospace - Orlando (46 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

TP Aerospace - Orlando has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.8 14.8 3 0 0
2022 14.4 9.6 2 1 0
2021 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Orlando

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MCO-ITP 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Airmotive, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Constant Aviation- LVM, McCarren International Airport 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carol Corp dba Hillaero Modification Center 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE L&M Farms of North Florida, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert C Hatton Inc 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hundley Farms Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panhandle Growers, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Vince Taylor 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogue Valley Door, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SPI- Shasta Lake 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Department 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE JBS Energy Solutions, LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE David Wight Construction Co. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Absolute Energy, L.L.C. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lonsdale K-4 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.