Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins · Tennessee

TPM Clinton

Clinton, TN · ~280 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TPM Clinton runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins workplace, earning a grade D.

TPM Clinton: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TPM Clinton safety composite

TPM Clinton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

TPM Clinton injury rate improved

TPM Clinton's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.2 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325991 · Clinton, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #14/19
  • PHOTO TPM Delaware
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~280 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TPM Delaware (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

TPM Clinton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TPM Clinton averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TPM Clinton TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=8 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where TPM Clinton falls in its industry

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blen establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 19 Custom compounding (i.e., blen employers in Tennessee.

TPM Clinton (280 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate TPM Clinton
TPM Clinton (280 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.5

TPM Clinton has more employees than the Custom compounding (i.e., blending and m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 3 1 0
2023 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2022 3.8 0.8 2 8 0
2021 4.9 2.6 13 0 0
2020 3.3 3.0 9 0 0
2019 8.0 5.2 22 1 0
2018 6.1 3.4 15 1 0
2017 3.6 1.7 11 0 0
2016 3.2 1.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325991 · TN · Clinton

342 Custom compounding (i.e., blending and mixing) of purchased plastics resins employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 35 employers in Clinton, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TPM Delaware 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BPI Packaging, LLC. 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPM Batavia 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spectrum Polymers 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Lilly Company 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE 194 - DET Nashville 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 735 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE 107 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Bend Manufacturing 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aisin Automotive Casting Tennessee 805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sl Tennessee, Lighting Division 707 FTE
CITY-NEAR SL Tennessee, Chassis Division 336 FTE
NAT-TCR Maruchan VA, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Morgantown, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayfair #131 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lowes Foods #191 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HHO 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toledo Oh 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Dallas 1727 S Main St (5267) 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Fayetteville NC (3816) 280 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.