Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing · California

Trackonomy Systems, Inc.

Name: Trackonomy Systems, Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

San Jose, CA · ~101 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.8
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Trackonomy Systems, Inc.: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. safety composite

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2020→2023

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. injury rate improved

Trackonomy Systems, Inc.'s TCR fell 7.4 from 7.4 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.4 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #29/43
PHOTO Suwanee
BOOK 4y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Suwanee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.8
Suwanee

2.8
3SI Security S

2.8
AeroSat - Manc

2.7
Nautel Maine I

2.7

What this shows Trackonomy Systems, Inc. averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2020=7.4 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Trackonomy Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

247 Antennas, transmitting and rec establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 43 Antennas, transmitting and rec employers in California.

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Trackonomy Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Antennas, transmitting and receiving, ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	0.0	0.0	0
2022	1.6	1.6	2
2021	2.1	2.1	2
2020	7.4	7.4	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · CA · San Jose

247 Antennas, transmitting and receiving, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Suwanee	SUWANEE, GA	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	3SI Security Systems	MACON, GA	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	AeroSat - Manchester	MANCHESTER, NH	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Nautel Maine Inc	BANGOR, ME	2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Kirschenmann Farms, Inc	BAKERSFIELD	101 FTE
STATE-SIZE	M & R Company	LODI	101 FTE
STATE-SIZE	California Sun Grower Services	COLLEGE CITY	101 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Camacho FLC, Inc	BAKERSFIELD	101 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE	San Jose	11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics)	San Jose	7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Rosendin - Main	San Jose	6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics)	San Jose	6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR	O'Connor Distributing- White River Division	Newport, AR	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	NAGL Manufacturing	Omaha, NE	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Store 6	Great Falls, MT	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Siemens Industry. Inc.	Heber Springs, AR	2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Morgan Newton Company	Plano, TX	101 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Fluid Connectors : Fort Worth PAR	Fort Worth, TX	101 FTE
NAT-SIZE	National Glass and Metal Co., Inc.	Horsham, PA	101 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Floyd Blinsky Trucking Inc	Yakima, WA	101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.