Grocery Store · Minnesota

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park

St. Louis Park, MN · ~87 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park runs at 720% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Grocery Store workplace, earning a grade F.

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park: 24.5 TCR = 720% of Grocery Store BLS 3.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park safety composite

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park: 18.7 → 26.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 68.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.4× in 2024

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park's TCR rose 7.7 from 18.7 in 2017 to 26.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 68.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · St. Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.5 · 720% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #325/327
  • PHOTO Trader Joe's 0048 Wh…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trader Joe's 0048 Whittier (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park averages 24.5 TCR (720% of the Grocery Store BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park TCR series: 2017=18.7 · 2018=18.9 · 2019=20 · 2020=23.1 · 2021=29.8 · 2022=68.2 · 2023=34.4 · 2024=26.4 · BLS 3.4

Where Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery Store establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #325 safest of 327 Grocery Store employers in Minnesota.

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park (87 employees, TCR 24.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015202530 Average employees Total Case Rate Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park
Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park (87 employees, TCR 24.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Trader Joe's 0710 St. Louis Park has fewer employees than the Grocery Store median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 26.4 9.9 15 1 0
2023 34.4 20.6 16 4 0
2022 68.2 42.8 23 12 0
2021 29.8 23.9 9 6 0
2020 23.1 14.7 9 2 0
2019 20.0 14.5 11 0 0
2018 18.9 13.2 10 0 0
2017 18.7 16.9 6 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · MN · St. Louis Park

30,654 Grocery Store employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 63 employers in St. Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0048 Whittier 24.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2063 Swn4 24.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0184 Chatsworth 24.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trader Joe's 0404 Fort Worth 24.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LS Black 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minger Construction Companies Incorporated 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Roofing 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Egan Company - Rochester, MN 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Japs Olson - St Louis Park 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of St. Louis Park 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lunds & Byerlys, St. Louis Park 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Monroe 1 24.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mesa Vista 24.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0048 Whittier 24.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Martinez On Time Parcel Inc. 24.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0751 Greenville 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0208 Livermore 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0164 Spokane 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0131 Bellevue 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.