Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Traditions of Lansdale

Blue Bell, PA · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Traditions of Lansdale runs at 211% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Traditions of Lansdale: 8.0 TCR = 211% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Traditions of Lansdale safety composite

Traditions of Lansdale scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Traditions of Lansdale: 3.0 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 14.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

Traditions of Lansdale's TCR rose 3.2 from 3.0 in 2022 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Blue Bell, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 211% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #127/233
  • PHOTO The Phoenix at James…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Phoenix at James Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Traditions of Lansdale in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Traditions of Lansdale averages 8.0 TCR (211% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Traditions of Lansdale TCR series: 2022=3 · 2023=14.9 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Traditions of Lansdale falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Traditions of Lansdale (64 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Traditions of Lansdale
Traditions of Lansdale (64 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Traditions of Lansdale has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 6.1 3 0 0
2023 14.9 0.0 8 0 0
2022 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Blue Bell

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 56 employers in Blue Bell, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Phoenix at James Creek 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - Seven Lakes 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gardens Assisted and Independent Living 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63168 SUNRISE OF OLD TAPPAN 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hershey Ag Services 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garman Builders, Inc. office 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Penn Energy Services 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE 160 Water Street, Reading, PA 19605 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Blue Bell - Power 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Blue Bell 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Normandy Farms Estates 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR BT Blue Bell 256 FTE
NAT-TCR LCR Broadway Campus 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Lodge at Manito 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Center Street Operations - Operations 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Finishing Technologies LLC 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Denny's 7760 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denny's 9548 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dedicated Logistics LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bazen Electric Company 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.