Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing · California

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario

Ontario, CA · ~93 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario runs at 95% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario: 3.1 TCR = 95% of Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario safety composite

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2024

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario injury rate improved

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.6 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326113 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 95% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Sekisui S-Lec America
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sekisui S-Lec America (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Transcontinental Packaging Ontario averages 3.1 TCR (95% of the Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=3.3 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Transcontinental Packaging Ontario falls in its industry

303 Acrylic film and unlaminated s establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Acrylic film and unlaminated s employers in California.

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario (93 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Transcontinental Packaging Ontario
Transcontinental Packaging Ontario (93 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 98 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Transcontinental Packaging Ontario has fewer employees than the Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2023 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326113 · CA · Ontario

303 Acrylic film and unlaminated sheet (except packaging) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sekisui S-Lec America 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sabert Corp 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransWorld Plastic Films Inc 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berry Plastics Corporation 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. View Farming, Inc. 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE PAC-MAN 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE E A & T 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain Meadow Mushroom Farms, Inc. 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Jefferson Hotel Associates (Holiday Inn Express) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Interstate Foam & Supply, Inc. Plant 3 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gett Industries, Ltd 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 443014-Newfane | NY | SNY-602 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Bleacher Holding Company Inc 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molecular Products - Louisville 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canopy by Hilton Washington DC | The Wharf 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Price Chopper #200 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.