Mental health facilities, residential · Missouri

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys

Columbia, MO · ~670 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mental health facilities, residential workplace, earning a grade A.

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Mental health facilities, residential BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys safety composite

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys held a steady TCR band

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Columbia, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/56
  • PHOTO ARC Corporate Offices
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~670 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARC Corporate Offices (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Transitional Living Group Home - Boys averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Mental health facilities, residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Transitional Living Group Home - Boys falls in its industry

1,165 Mental health facilities, resi establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 56 Mental health facilities, resi employers in Missouri.

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys (670 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Transitional Living Group Home - Boys
Transitional Living Group Home - Boys (670 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Transitional Living Group Home - Boys has more employees than the Mental health facilities, residential median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · MO · Columbia

1,165 Mental health facilities, residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 270 employers in Columbia, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARC Corporate Offices 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carlson Drake House 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harstad House 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bella House 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Transitional Living Group Home - Girls 670 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirksville Community Office 670 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poplar Bluff, Missouri Facility 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE Respite House 672 FTE
CITY-NEAR Equipmentshare.com, Inc. 5,242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mortgage Research Center 2,903 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boone Hospital Center 1,562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia 684 FTE
NAT-TCR AM General Technology and Engineering Center 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Road Bear RV-SFO 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Borger Refinery 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Contract Land Staff, LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Avenue 670 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6795-86052B0399 670 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flowers Foods, Inc. 670 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW6 670 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.