Electric power distribution systems · Maryland

Transportation Building

Hughesville, MD · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Transportation Building runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Transportation Building: 1.9 TCR = 159% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Transportation Building safety composite

Transportation Building scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Transportation Building: 0.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 2.33× in 2024

Transportation Building's TCR rose 4.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Hughesville, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 159% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #15/30
  • PHOTO BUXSC Buxmont Servic…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BUXSC Buxmont Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Transportation Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Transportation Building averages 1.9 TCR (159% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Transportation Building TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Transportation Building falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 30 Electric power distribution sy employers in Maryland.

Transportation Building (23 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Transportation Building
Transportation Building (23 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Transportation Building has fewer employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2023 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MD · Hughesville

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Hughesville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BUXSC Buxmont Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR O&R West Nyack 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurel Office 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NV Energy-Fleet Services 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Centrica Business Solutions - Solar 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forestville Office 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairmont (Cheval Condominium) 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG TOW 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Engineering and Operations Center 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Engineering & Operations Center 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters Building 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 103 FTE
NAT-TCR Altium Packaging - Chino 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Crane Composites - Goshen Plant 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Experi-Metal Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Microchip Technology Inc. 2180 Fortune Dr 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Synergy Cameron 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aitkin Public School Bus Garage 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryder System, Inc 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSI Petroleum, LLC/Starfleet-RB 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.