Airport baggage handling services · North Carolina

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf

Concord, NC · ~30 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade F.

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf: 9.3 TCR = 207% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf safety composite

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.7

2018→2023

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf injury rate improved

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf's TCR fell 12.7 from 22.9 in 2018 to 10.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=22.9 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=10.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 207% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #47/52
  • PHOTO DAB Daytona Beach In…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAB Daytona Beach International Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf averages 9.3 TCR (207% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf TCR series: 2018=22.9 · 2019=13.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=10.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 52 Airport baggage handling servi employers in North Carolina.

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf (30 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf
Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf (30 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc. Jqf has fewer employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.2 10.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.9 8.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.7 6.9 4 0 0
2018 22.9 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NC · Concord

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAB Daytona Beach International Airport 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6957-CRP 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4765-MIACC0470 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shugart Farm 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hays Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hight Family Farms LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE High Point Operations Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR PACE Farmville 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Les Schwab Tire Center-Elko 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Broward ADT 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson Thermal Systems 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE FL, RI Jacksonville Mayo 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mika Metal Fabricating 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gray Warehouse 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blake Drilling Company, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.