Wall component (i.e., exterior, interior), prefabricated, installation · New Jersey

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT

Trenton, NJ · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Wall component (i.e., exterior, interior), prefabricated, installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT: 2.8 TCR = 98% of Wall component (i.e., exterior, interior), prefabricated, installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT safety composite

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2022→2023

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT injury rate improved

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT's TCR fell 1.9 from 3.7 in 2022 to 1.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2023=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238130 · Trenton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 98% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Bouma Corporation: T…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bouma Corporation: Traverse City (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT averages 2.8 TCR (98% of the Wall component (i.e., exterior, interior), prefabricated, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2023=1.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT falls in its industry

387 Wall component (i.e., exterior establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Wall component (i.e., exterior employers in New Jersey.

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT (50 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT
Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT (50 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Trenton (New Jersey) FS AAT has fewer employees than the Wall component (i.e., exterior, interior median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 3.7 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238130 · NJ · Trenton

387 Wall component (i.e., exterior, interior), prefabricated, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 99 employers in Trenton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bouma Corporation: Traverse City 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mindak Commercial Construction, LLC. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interiors Mason - Cleveland Construction 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nomad Framing, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kindle Energy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCKEE 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE KLINE BROTHERS LANDSCAPING EAST 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Civil Glassboro 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR CapitalHealth Regional Medical Center 2,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Health Regional Medical Center 2,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trenton Board of Education 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Trenton, NJ-USA 1,135 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest-Waukesha 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest - Aurora 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fm 5 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Mooresville Nc 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Great Western Lumber Company 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paterson Wa (Watts Dairy) 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Oakdale, MN 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Upham House 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.