Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors · Michigan

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc.

Midland, MI · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. safety composite

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=5.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238910 · Midland, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/55
  • PHOTO MEC, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEC, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=5.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. falls in its industry

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or la establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 55 Excavating, earthmoving, or la employers in Michigan.

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc.
Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. (27 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. has fewer employees than the Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.7 2.8 2 0 0
2018 6.7 3.3 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238910 · MI · Midland

1,750 Excavating, earthmoving, or land clearing contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEC, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nick Falcone & Sons Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diplomat Construction & Demolition, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Rock Demolition 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Badger Evergreen Nursery LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE K Drive Greenhouse Co 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (MO) 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luurtsema Sales Inc. 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlantic Private Care Services 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mack Engineering Corp 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Southco, Inc. at Honeoye Falls Location 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Firethorn, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Newbury North Associates, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodhouse Post & Beam Homes, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ralph Martinez Trucking Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forest Ridge Senior 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.