Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing · North Carolina

Triad EPS Plant

High Point, NC · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Triad EPS Plant runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Triad EPS Plant: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Triad EPS Plant safety composite

Triad EPS Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Triad EPS Plant: 0.0 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Triad EPS Plant's TCR rose 6.5 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · High Point, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Storopack, Inc.- Cin…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Storopack, Inc.- Cincinnati Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Triad EPS Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Triad EPS Plant averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Triad EPS Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Triad EPS Plant falls in its industry

260 Insulation and cushioning, pol establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Insulation and cushioning, pol employers in North Carolina.

Triad EPS Plant (33 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Triad EPS Plant
Triad EPS Plant (33 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Triad EPS Plant has fewer employees than the Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene f median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 3.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · NC · High Point

260 Insulation and cushioning, polystyrene foam plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 243 employers in High Point, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Storopack, Inc.- Cincinnati Service Center 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas molded products, a division of atlas roofing corporation 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Molded Products 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EFP-Decatur, AL 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Brothers Inc 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Strickland Farms Payroll 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE James B. Morris Farms, Inc, 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTL, LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR WFBMC - High Point Medical Center 1,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR CITY OF HIGH POINT 1,532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Point Medical Center 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR AWRC-Richmond 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Artone LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Acura of Auburn 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MEM 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Middleton Lumber Company, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill CFL - Palm Bay 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill CFL - Longwood 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Library 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.