Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · California

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley

Apple Valley, CA · ~76 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley runs at 407% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley: 15.5 TCR = 407% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley safety composite

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley: 4.9 → 26.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 26.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2018

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley's TCR rose 21.1 from 4.9 in 2017 to 26.0 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Apple Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 407% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #88/91
  • PHOTO Garfield Manor
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garfield Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley averages 15.5 TCR (407% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley TCR series: 2017=4.9 · 2018=26 · BLS 3.8

Where Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 91 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in California.

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley (76 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley
Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley (76 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Trinity Youth Services - Apple Valley has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 26.0 10.4 15 0 0
2017 4.9 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Apple Valley

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 48 employers in Apple Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garfield Manor 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CNS Encino Clinic & Residential 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4287_10576 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Campagna Academy 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ADMINISTRATION 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3181_6797 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&J Labor,Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fujishige Farms, Inc. 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001450 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA755 ST MARY MEDICAL CENTER-APPLE VALLEY HR 1,516 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7033 1,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7033 973 FTE
NAT-TCR NOVA 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Txluo - Lubbock 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Autumnview Health Care Facility 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 312960-Fernley Po 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CN Portland 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaman Aerostructures - Wichita 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kemco 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE WVCO Admin 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.